diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'rhtvision/doc/install/tools.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | rhtvision/doc/install/tools.txt | 137 |
1 files changed, 137 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/rhtvision/doc/install/tools.txt b/rhtvision/doc/install/tools.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7e4d763 --- /dev/null +++ b/rhtvision/doc/install/tools.txt @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@ + This file gives a list of tools and libraries you used by the package. The +list isn't complete so please report any missing stuff. + The list is oriented to systems using the GNU tools, not for Borland and +Miscrosoft environments. + IMPORTANT! most Linux systems have the needed libraries installed but +rarely have the headers installed. They are provided in separated packages +intended for development (XXXX-dev). + +TOOLS +===== + +Binutils: +--------- + + They include the linker and assembler. They must be the GNU versions. + +Compiler: +--------- + + The code was compiled with GCC 2.7.x, 2.8.x, 2.95.x, egcs 1.x, 3.x and may +be other versions. As I can't have systems with all of them I can't be sure +all of them can be currently used. + I suggest gcc 2.8.1 or newer because 2.7.2 had some bugs in the C++ library +and its workaround could go away soon. + I don't recommend gcc 2.9.6 nor egcs 1.x because these compilers have too +much bugs. Workarounds for these problems were created but as I don't have +these compilers new code could break. I recommend using a more stable +compiler. + The gcc 2.95.x compilers gave me very good results. + The code cleanly compiled with gcc 3.0, 3.1.x, 3.2.x and 3.3 but each +release of gcc 3.x likes to break something in the C++ stuff so be patient +and report any problems. One particular detail is that gcc 3.x is much more +slower than gcc 2.95.x when compiling C++ code. This is because the standard +C++ library now follows the ISO 1998 standard much more closely and hence +does a heavy use of templates, it looks like gcc 3.x performance to compile +such a code is really bad. + At the moment of this writing (june 2003) my recommendation is gcc 2.95.4. + +bzip2: +------ + + Optionally (configuration option) used to create the tarball distributions. + +fileutils: +---------- + + They are rm, cp, mv, etc. and all UNIX systems have them. DJGPP users must +install them. + +gettext: +-------- + + Needed for internationalization. They aren't mandatory. Note: this is one +of those packages that likes to break its API. + Note: Solaris provides its own implementation but it isn't supported. + +gzip: +----- + + Used only to create the tarball distributions. + +make: +----- + + Obviously mandatory. You must install GNU make, other make tools aren't +enough. The executable can be called gmake to avoid collisions with the +native make tool. + +Perl: +----- + + The configuration script and others are Perl scripts, you'll need Perl +5.x. I strongly recommend using it even when the tarball and zip files +usually contains preconfigured sources that will compile out-of-the-box in +many systems. + +RHIDE: +------ + + RHIDE users can configure the package and the compile it using the RHIDE +projects. But you'll need a really new RHIDE, some times even from CVS. So I +no longer recommend using RHIDE unless you are going to debug or modify the +code. + At the moment of this writing (june 2003) I use RHIDE 1.5 from CVS. + +shellutils: +----------- + + They are pwd, uname, etc. and all UNIX systems have them. DJGPP users must +install them. + +tar: +---- + + Used only to create the tarball distributions. + Note: not all tar implementations are usable, get GNU tar if you have +problems with it. + +textutils: +---------- + + They are cat, split, etc. and all UNIX systems have them. DJGPP users must +install them. + + +LIBRARIES +========= + +gpm: +---- + + It provides mouse functionality for the Linux console. I tested versions +1.13, 1.14, 1.17.x and 1.19.x. + Note: binaries compiled with a version usually fails to work if you change +the gpm daemon version. + +ncurses: +-------- + + This is mandatory for UNIX systems where the X11 isn't available. But is +recommended for all UNIX systems because it is used when the terminal isn't +known. Versions 3.4 and newer were used. I remmember also testing with 4.2, +5.0, 5.2 and 5.3. + Note: none of the listed versions compiles ok using gcc 3.3 and -Wall +because the headers contains chars as array indexes. + +X libraries: +------------ + + They are needed to create a UNIX application that can connect to an X +server and provide a good text emulation. It works even better than the +ncurses driver. That's a must for UNIX systems with X11 installed. + CygWin also provides X11 under Win32 systems. This is just a curiosity. +When I tested it the performance was really poor but the test application +was functional. + + |